Despite the U.S. coal industry's depiction of itself as a
friend of the working class, statistics show that even as coal production has
expanded in West Virginia, jobs in coal have declined steadily in the region
since 1985. This drop in
employment corresponds with coal companies' turn toward highly mechanized
mining techniques such as Mountaintop Removal, which allow companies to extract
coal faster than ever before with fewer workers and with devastating
environmental consequences.
How do coal companies win the hearts and minds of the
workers they exploit? This YouTube
video of Ted Nugent speaking at the Massey Energy "Friends of America Rally" in 2009 in Holden, West
Virginia hold some interesting clues:
In this speech, Nugent calls for Congress to "quit
regulating us based on some pierced-eared hippie in San Francisco who thinks
we’re destroying the environment while she puts on her light switch, and the
light comes on." Nugent
continues, "On behalf of the Nugent family, I say start up the bulldozers
and get me some more coal, Massey!" The crowd, waving miniature American
flags, goes wild. As someone who believes in workers'
safety and workers' rights, the crowd's wild support for Massey Energy seems wrong
to me. Don't these people know
that they're being exploited?
Don't they notice that their standard of living has declined since Mountaintop Removal (as opposed to traditional
underground mining) became popular in their region?
The key to Nugent's success in this speech lies in a complex
mixture of ethos and pathos, with little to no logos involved (although logos
can certainly be used to make the same points, and other speakers at the rally
do this). Nugent's lower class
accent is essential to his mode of argumentation, as he positions himself as
fundamentally similar to his listeners - a good, hardworking American. Telling the story of how he made enough
money to buy his first guitar, Nugent explains that he shoveled snow, sold
squirrel skins, washed cars, and worked at a gas station for $1/hr, taking
dirty jobs that others wouldn't take in order to work for his dreams. In addition, he brags about hunting,
makes fun of animal rights activists, and positions his interests as similar to
those of his listeners.
Nugent's accent and his pride in squirrel hunting and
working at the gas station give him covert prestige in this situation. He is not one of those suit-and-tie
Washington politicos, he is a normal working class American, with normal rural working class interests and
experiences. By emphasizing the
non-mainstream-ness of these interests and experiences, Nugent positions
himself and his listeners as united by being different from the urban liberal
elite that governs America.
If these disenfranchised workers feel like outsiders from
the Washington D.C. political scene they see on TV, they especially feel
separate from the liberal environmentalists fighting for regulation of coal
companies. These environmental
activists have urban accents and styles of dress, and make little effort to
understand or respect the lifestyle choices of coal mining communities. Their worldview involves a set of
values far from those accepted in normal in these small rural communities. They seem to offer no alternative
source of income for coalminers, while fighting for regulations that will hurt
coal companies profits and probably increase the region's already growing unemployment
rate. At the same time, they argue
that they are fighting against Mountaintop Removal mining for the benefit of
the coal mining communities.
Ted Nugent, by appealing to his audience's sense of
disenfranchisement, their reliance on coal mining for a paycheck, their
conservative family values, their reliance on and enjoyment of hunting, and
their pride in their worldview and lifestyle, makes his arguments infinitely
more appealing than some University student from New York using communist and
environmentalist rhetoric to explain to people that they are being exploited
and the environment is being destroyed.
I think you bring up some great points in this. For example how Nugent "positions himself as fundamentally similar to his listeners - a good, hardworking American." This is the solidarity and not science or research we were talking about in class. I think it is one of the most useful things anyone campaigning can possibly do. Currently Obama has been trying to unite women in solidarity because of the action several groups of people have been trying to take against women's health. I believe it is easier to unite a group of people when speaking to them in solidarity rather than scientific terms. Just as you say in you last paragraph.
ReplyDelete