Sunday, February 19, 2012

Cutting the Gordian Knot

A Billion Wicked Thoughts and Sexing the Body are two books that address issues involving sexuality and desire, but both take on an entirely different approach, and this leaves the reader with conflicting perspectives on the issues of sexuality and desire.  After reading A Billion Wicked Thoughts there is a clear, succinct argument made for the dualism of male sexual desire and female sexual desire.  A Billion Wicked Thoughts claims that male desire is deeply intertwined with physical and psychological attributes.  Males have distinct physical desires that can trigger immediate arousal, leaving men powerless to curves, breasts, tiny feet, and other "desirable traits".  Women have a dichotomous relationship between physical arousal and psychological arousal.  It simply is not enough for women to visually see attractive bodies, rather, they need to investigate the potential for a relationship as well as factors that make an ideal partner.  Women have a lot at stake, and from an evolutionary perspective, they need a stable partner who can help raise children, provide food and shelter, and support a family.  A Billion Wicked Thoughts provides a stance on the issue of sexuality through intriguing statistics and logical reasoning that gives the reader a satisfying, assured sense of self.

"I look to cut through the Gordian knot of dualistic thought.  I propose to modify Halperin's bon mot that "sexuality is not a somatic fact, it is a cultural effect," arguing instead that sexuality is a somatic fact created by a cultural effect (Fausto-Sterling 21)."

Sexing the Body accesses the issue of sexuality and human desire with a comprehensive, wholesome approach that takes past research, anecdotes, and ideas to provide a broad discussion.  This book does not seek to give facts or an ultimate truth.  Fausto-Sterling claims that sex has been put into two broad physical categories of male and female, but that sex is not just based solely on what sex organ or genetic material a person has.  These broad categories are social decisions supported by scientific knowledge that creates cultural understandings of how sex and gender define a person.  With the definition of man and woman there are also constructed gender differences that define typical behaviors and attributes of men and women.  Men are better at math and science while women excel in language and literature.  Men have higher physical capabilities while women have physical limits and boundaries.

These two books have an entirely opposite procedure for discussing the issue of sexuality and human desire.  Reading these two books will only strengthen my conflicts with sexuality and give me different feelings and reactions.  A Billion Wicked Thoughts will provide me with the crutch of the scientific method to suspend my disbelief, restrain my uncertainty, and quickly read through enticing data with bold claims as if it was another Harry Potter book.   Sexing the Body will create a stimulating discussion on human sexuality with no final objective thought, statement or idea.

3 comments:

  1. I liked the way you summed up A Billion Wicked Thoughts...and I agree with it as well! However, I think I have to disagree a little with what you said about Sexing the Body, that "This book does not seek to give facts or an ultimate truth." Although it may not give an "ultimate truth", I think it most certainly provides facts, and lots of them, hence all the footnotes. Whether we choose to see them as fact may be up for debate, but I think she is certainly trying to present them as such! I haven't read the entire book, but I think that Sexing the Body will have, at least to an extent, a final objective thought/statement/idea. But I guess we will have to see :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree with your points about how Fausto-Sterling frames her thoughts and ideas. I was also struggling on exactly what she is presenting to us, it knowledge, or facts, or opinions, or a combination? With a work as discursive as this, it seems tough to sift through everything (her arguments, footnotes, references to certain communities). I think your statement, also quoted in the comment above me "This book does not seek to give facts or an ultimate truth.", is on the right track, just maybe a little bit too cut and dry. I certainly would think Fausto-Sterling believes she is giving us facts backed up by analysis, but definitely not pigeonholing some sort of ultimate truth. Good, provocative post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I want Mike's 'facts' and 'opinions' to hold still and stay separate, but reading this, it's all mixed up.

    ReplyDelete